Christopher R. Kemp
Christopher was a founding member of this firm, which opened its doors on October 1, 2010. Christopher practices primarily in the areas of: criminal defense, appeals, family law including divorce and child custody, and juvenile law, representing both parents and children. He has handled hundreds of criminal and family law cases for his clients. Christopher is also a mediator for Polk County family law cases. Christopher has also served as the contract defense attorney for all juveniles involved in the Polk County Juvenile Drug Court program since October 2013.
Christopher was born in Apple Valley, Minnesota. He graduated from Eastview High School in 2003. After high school, Christopher attended Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota. At Carleton, Christopher was a three year letter winner in football and also pole vaulted for the Knights track and field team. After graduating early from Carleton, he spent six months in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, working as a substitute teacher and track and field coach at the Pine Crest School.
Christopher returned to the mid-west to attend Drake Law School in Des Moines, Iowa. While at Drake, he was a member of the Drake Law Review, gained practical experience through the Criminal Defense Clinic and Appellate Clinic, interned for the Honorable Federal Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer in the Southern District of Iowa, worked at the Iowa Civil Rights Commission, and worked as a law clerk for the law offices of Rosenberg & Morse and the Stowers Law Firm. Christopher graduated early from Drake Law School with High Honors in December 2009 and was sworn into the Iowa Bar Association in April 2010.
In his free time, Christopher enjoys spending time with his family, reading, playing and watching sports, and woodworking.
– Barrister, Blackstone Inn of Court
– Secretary/Treasurer, Dallas Bar Association
– Iowa Bar Association
– Polk County Bar Association
– Polk County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project
– Ney v. Ney 891 N.W.2d 446 (2017). Mr. Kemp successfully argued this case to the Iowa Supreme Court, gaining reversal of the district court’s order dismissing his client’s case for lack of jurisdiction. The Court ruled that the statute governing the issuance of protective orders in certain situations does not eliminate the district court’s jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief prohibiting contact between persons not covered by the statute.
– State v. Kern 831 N.W.2d. 149 (Iowa 2013) (convictions for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, manufacturing marijuana, possession with intent to deliver, and failure to possess a drug tax stamp overturned)
– In re Marriage of Mineart, 2014 WL 3511874 (Iowa App. July 16, 2014). Mr. Kemp handled the appeal in which the Court of Appeals reduced his client’s spousal support obligation was reduced from $2000.00 per month to $1500.00 per month, and awarded Mr. Kemp’s client an additional $42,621.00 in the property distribution.
– State v. Dolph, 2012 WL 3590060 (Iowa App. August 22, 2012) (convictions for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana reversed and charges dismissed)
– In re Marriage of Kelly, 2013 WL 5229763 (Iowa App. September 18, 2013) (court of appeals upheld district court’s Order Modifying Decree of Dissolution, transferring primary custody of the minor child to Mr. Kemp’s client based on a substantial change in the circumstances). Mr. Kemp represented the Respondent at both the trial court and appellate level.
– State v. Girres: defendant found not guilty by jury on charges of Operating While Intoxicated and domestic abuse assault.
– State v. Goemaat: evidence suppressed resulting from a traffic stop where the officer’s only justification for initiating the stop was that the driver had air fresheners hanging from the rear view mirror. Mr. Kemp argued, and the court agreed, that this common practice does not violate Iowa Code Section 321.438’s prohibition of driving with an obstructed view. As a result of the suppression, the felony drug charges were dismissed.
– State v. Clarke: evidence suppressed as a result of an illegal search and seizure and the charges were dismissed. The court found that the defendant did not voluntarily consent to the search and the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to search the defendant’s person.
– State v. Freeman: defendant found not guilty by jury on charge of being a felon in possession
– State v. Yasumura: evidence suppressed as result of unlawful search and seizure and charges dismissed
– State v. Cardenas: defendant found not guilty of willful injury (Class C felony – guilty of lesser-included simple misdemeanor assault charge)